文章目录
- 背景
- 原因
- 解决方案
背景
问题如下，1.有一个下划线标注所发表的期刊或者会议2.不是斜体的。
上面这样肯定是不对的，那为什么会出现这种情况呢？
原因
I think I know of no style that applies underlining to titles in the bibliography. Many styles use italics, which in LaTeX can be implemented with \emph. If you load the package ulem, \emph will produce underlining instead of italics.
This is what happened here. If you download the source code from https://arxiv.org/format/1912.12033 (or more specifically https://arxiv.org/e-print/1912.12033) and rename the downloaded file to 1912.12033.tar.gz, you will find that the paper uses the bibliography style
\bibliographystyle{IEEEtran}
which uses \emph and would usually give italic titles. The file also loads
\usepackage{ulem}
in the preamble so that \emph produces underlining.
This is very likely not what the IEEE wants on submission, so I suggest you do not load ulem and do not try to emulate the output from that paper.
翻译一下就是：正常情况下，引用的期刊或者会议都是斜体的，而不是像之前那样有一个下划线。出现下划线的原因就在于导入了奇怪的包 ulem ，斜体命令此时会变成下划线命令。
至于说我为什么要导入这个包，其实是因为我要用那个删除线：
删除线的命令是\sout，需要导入包 ulem。
解决方案
1.使用删除线，好像并不是只有\sout这一种方法。我们可以使用其他命令，这样就不用导入 ulem包了。
2.对ulem包加上一个选项normalem，这可以使得你可以继续使用\sout命令，且\emph{}仍为斜体，那么引用格式就不会异常了。
\usepackage[normalem]{ulem} % normalem选项使\emph{}仍为斜体
如下：
